Hello. This time we are meeting here, Mr. Knarfster.
I will write this properly and confirm the same thing I stated on ASF. The attempt to manipulate the situation and make me look foolish there did not fully succeed, as even the Admin corrected the situation.
Nevertheless, I will take the time to describe everything once again, focusing only on facts — because facts are what matter to me, not rumors or reopening matters that have already been resolved.
Fact 1: During the attempt to clarify the issue, Knarfster misled my rep by claiming that he had not ordered Masteron from us — which he actually did. Maybe he forgot; that can happen to anyone. Due to inconsistencies and misleading statements, my rep removed him from Telegram. Whether someone agrees with that decision or not, my reps are independent individuals whom I trust and who had the right to act as they did.
Fact 2: I refunded the money for Primo, and Knarfster initially agreed to return the product so that it could be independently tested.
Fact 3: After receiving the refund, Knarfster later stated that he would not return the Primo, claiming that customers should not be asked to do such things — despite the fact that we had agreed on this the day before. Independent testing is extremely important to me, as I conduct extensive laboratory testing, including blind tests.
Fact 4: After four separate requests for the return of the product, I decided to close the matter. The issue became unnecessarily inflated and began to look intentional. Knarfster continued posting about it wherever possible on ASF, until his thread was closed by the Admin.
To summarize: Knarfster explained his refusal to return the Primo by saying that it would “bring nothing to the community.”
I would also like to add that I have had several similar situations in the past where attempts were made to deceive me during blind testing. In three cases, the tests confirmed manipulation. Because of that, I changed my system: products are returned to the rep, checked for third-party interference, and then sent for testing. I now only accept testing of sealed, original, unopened products — without any third-party interference. This applies to all products.
Since Knarfster refused to resolve this matter properly, it is closed for me. Unfortunately, I wanted to clarify it, but this is my final decision. I will not beg anyone to cooperate if the other party is unwilling.
I am posting here three blind-test results of Primo from other users from the same period. I use the same batch from the very beginning and test it specifically for clients, so they have full transparency and confidence in how seriously I treat quality control.
I am closing this topic and do not intend to return to it. I have already spent a significant amount of time writing about it here and on ASF — time I do not have.
I wish everyone a good day
I will write this properly and confirm the same thing I stated on ASF. The attempt to manipulate the situation and make me look foolish there did not fully succeed, as even the Admin corrected the situation.
Nevertheless, I will take the time to describe everything once again, focusing only on facts — because facts are what matter to me, not rumors or reopening matters that have already been resolved.
Fact 1: During the attempt to clarify the issue, Knarfster misled my rep by claiming that he had not ordered Masteron from us — which he actually did. Maybe he forgot; that can happen to anyone. Due to inconsistencies and misleading statements, my rep removed him from Telegram. Whether someone agrees with that decision or not, my reps are independent individuals whom I trust and who had the right to act as they did.
Fact 2: I refunded the money for Primo, and Knarfster initially agreed to return the product so that it could be independently tested.
Fact 3: After receiving the refund, Knarfster later stated that he would not return the Primo, claiming that customers should not be asked to do such things — despite the fact that we had agreed on this the day before. Independent testing is extremely important to me, as I conduct extensive laboratory testing, including blind tests.
Fact 4: After four separate requests for the return of the product, I decided to close the matter. The issue became unnecessarily inflated and began to look intentional. Knarfster continued posting about it wherever possible on ASF, until his thread was closed by the Admin.
To summarize: Knarfster explained his refusal to return the Primo by saying that it would “bring nothing to the community.”
I would also like to add that I have had several similar situations in the past where attempts were made to deceive me during blind testing. In three cases, the tests confirmed manipulation. Because of that, I changed my system: products are returned to the rep, checked for third-party interference, and then sent for testing. I now only accept testing of sealed, original, unopened products — without any third-party interference. This applies to all products.
Since Knarfster refused to resolve this matter properly, it is closed for me. Unfortunately, I wanted to clarify it, but this is my final decision. I will not beg anyone to cooperate if the other party is unwilling.
I am posting here three blind-test results of Primo from other users from the same period. I use the same batch from the very beginning and test it specifically for clients, so they have full transparency and confidence in how seriously I treat quality control.
I am closing this topic and do not intend to return to it. I have already spent a significant amount of time writing about it here and on ASF — time I do not have.
I wish everyone a good day
