Steroids Reason for inflammatory response and PIP of high concentration testosterone, is it the carrier oil?

[dementus]

For the past 6 months I've only had experience with the different testosterone formulations put out by Para Pharma. To be clear, I'm not calling out Para Pharma or UGFREAK on this, I'm just trying to pin down the cause of inflammation. Before I pin any new vial of steroids I'll always do a subcutaneous micro dose (0.1 mL) as a "test" dose to ensure sterility and make sure I don't have some sort of reaction whether it's simply inflammatory or, at worst, an allergic/anaphylactic reaction. It seems far more bearable to deal with a subcutaneous reaction than it is with an intramuscular reaction.

Here's the situation: I've never had an inflammatory problem with the Para Phara TESTO E 250 formulation but I have with both the SUSTA 350 and TESTO E 400 formulations. The SUSTA 350 formulation seems to have been a much milder reaction as compared to the TESTO E 400 formulation. I've asked artificial intelligence like Gemini what could be the cause of an inflammatory reaction (outside of an infection) from a subcutaneous testosterone injection and got back an answer that it's either the carrier oil or it's the injection site (i.e. fatty subcutaneous tissue versus an intramuscular injection). I wrote "outside of an infection" because I have micro-filtered the TESTO E 400 formulation using a 0.22um hydrophobic PTFE filter and I still get an inflammatory response when injecting subcutaneously.

I feel like I've narrowed it down to either the carrier oil or it's that high concentration testosterone injections just don't do well subcutaneously. I say the carrier oil because artificial intelligence told me that high concentration testosterone solutions often use seed oils. I know for a fact that I don't have a problem with MCT oil because several bottles I've used in the past have said they contain MCT oil. The Para Pharma bottles I have don't say what type of carrier oil they contain so I'm left wondering. I asked Para Pharma directly months ago through a link on their website but they never responded. Maybe we can get a UGFREAK rep to chime in? @ugfreak

TLDR?
Is there a difference in carrier oils between the different Para Pharma testosterone formulations? I ask because I don't have an inflammatory response with the E 250 formulation but I do have a reaction with the SUSTA 350 and E 400 formulations.

 

[GHgut4life]

For the past 6 months I've only had experience with the different testosterone formulations put out by Para Pharma. To be clear, I'm not calling out Para Pharma or UGFREAK on this, I'm just trying to pin down the cause of inflammation. Before I pin any new vial of steroids I'll always do a subcutaneous micro dose (0.1 mL) as a "test" dose to ensure sterility and make sure I don't have some sort of reaction whether it's simply inflammatory or, at worst, an allergic/anaphylactic reaction. It seems far more bearable to deal with a subcutaneous reaction than it is with an intramuscular reaction.

Here's the situation: I've never had an inflammatory problem with the Para Phara TESTO E 250 formulation but I have with both the SUSTA 350 and TESTO E 400 formulations. The SUSTA 350 formulation seems to have been a much milder reaction as compared to the TESTO E 400 formulation. I've asked artificial intelligence like Gemini what could be the cause of an inflammatory reaction (outside of an infection) from a subcutaneous testosterone injection and got back an answer that it's either the carrier oil or it's the injection site (i.e. fatty subcutaneous tissue versus an intramuscular injection). I wrote "outside of an infection" because I have micro-filtered the TESTO E 400 formulation using a 0.22um hydrophobic PTFE filter and I still get an inflammatory response when injecting subcutaneously.

I feel like I've narrowed it down to either the carrier oil or it's that high concentration testosterone injections just don't do well subcutaneously. I say the carrier oil because artificial intelligence told me that high concentration testosterone solutions often use seed oils. I know for a fact that I don't have a problem with MCT oil because several bottles I've used in the past have said they contain MCT oil. The Para Pharma bottles I have don't say what type of carrier oil they contain so I'm left wondering. I asked Para Pharma directly months ago through a link on their website but they never responded. Maybe we can get a UGFREAK rep to chime in? @ugfreak

TLDR?
Is there a difference in carrier oils between the different Para Pharma testosterone formulations? I ask because I don't have an inflammatory response with the E 250 formulation but I do have a reaction with the SUSTA 350 and E 400 formulations.

View attachment 44742

I think inflammation is normal with high mg/ml brother
I remember T400 from Mexico was brutal

 

[Mobster]

I think inflammation is normal with high mg/ml brother
I remember T400 from Mexico was brutal

Less common than it used to be but still an issue for some

 

[QuadSweep]

For the past 6 months I've only had experience with the different testosterone formulations put out by Para Pharma. To be clear, I'm not calling out Para Pharma or UGFREAK on this, I'm just trying to pin down the cause of inflammation. Before I pin any new vial of steroids I'll always do a subcutaneous micro dose (0.1 mL) as a "test" dose to ensure sterility and make sure I don't have some sort of reaction whether it's simply inflammatory or, at worst, an allergic/anaphylactic reaction. It seems far more bearable to deal with a subcutaneous reaction than it is with an intramuscular reaction.

Here's the situation: I've never had an inflammatory problem with the Para Phara TESTO E 250 formulation but I have with both the SUSTA 350 and TESTO E 400 formulations. The SUSTA 350 formulation seems to have been a much milder reaction as compared to the TESTO E 400 formulation. I've asked artificial intelligence like Gemini what could be the cause of an inflammatory reaction (outside of an infection) from a subcutaneous testosterone injection and got back an answer that it's either the carrier oil or it's the injection site (i.e. fatty subcutaneous tissue versus an intramuscular injection). I wrote "outside of an infection" because I have micro-filtered the TESTO E 400 formulation using a 0.22um hydrophobic PTFE filter and I still get an inflammatory response when injecting subcutaneously.

I feel like I've narrowed it down to either the carrier oil or it's that high concentration testosterone injections just don't do well subcutaneously. I say the carrier oil because artificial intelligence told me that high concentration testosterone solutions often use seed oils. I know for a fact that I don't have a problem with MCT oil because several bottles I've used in the past have said they contain MCT oil. The Para Pharma bottles I have don't say what type of carrier oil they contain so I'm left wondering. I asked Para Pharma directly months ago through a link on their website but they never responded. Maybe we can get a UGFREAK rep to chime in? @ugfreak

TLDR?
Is there a difference in carrier oils between the different Para Pharma testosterone formulations? I ask because I don't have an inflammatory response with the E 250 formulation but I do have a reaction with the SUSTA 350 and E 400 formulations.

View attachment 44742

There are different reactions to different gear.
You need to figure out what works for you which you are doing

 

[Ulter]

For the past 6 months I've only had experience with the different testosterone formulations put out by Para Pharma. To be clear, I'm not calling out Para Pharma or UGFREAK on this, I'm just trying to pin down the cause of inflammation. Before I pin any new vial of steroids I'll always do a subcutaneous micro dose (0.1 mL) as a "test" dose to ensure sterility and make sure I don't have some sort of reaction whether it's simply inflammatory or, at worst, an allergic/anaphylactic reaction. It seems far more bearable to deal with a subcutaneous reaction than it is with an intramuscular reaction.

Here's the situation: I've never had an inflammatory problem with the Para Phara TESTO E 250 formulation but I have with both the SUSTA 350 and TESTO E 400 formulations. The SUSTA 350 formulation seems to have been a much milder reaction as compared to the TESTO E 400 formulation. I've asked artificial intelligence like Gemini what could be the cause of an inflammatory reaction (outside of an infection) from a subcutaneous testosterone injection and got back an answer that it's either the carrier oil or it's the injection site (i.e. fatty subcutaneous tissue versus an intramuscular injection). I wrote "outside of an infection" because I have micro-filtered the TESTO E 400 formulation using a 0.22um hydrophobic PTFE filter and I still get an inflammatory response when injecting subcutaneously.

I feel like I've narrowed it down to either the carrier oil or it's that high concentration testosterone injections just don't do well subcutaneously. I say the carrier oil because artificial intelligence told me that high concentration testosterone solutions often use seed oils. I know for a fact that I don't have a problem with MCT oil because several bottles I've used in the past have said they contain MCT oil. The Para Pharma bottles I have don't say what type of carrier oil they contain so I'm left wondering. I asked Para Pharma directly months ago through a link on their website but they never responded. Maybe we can get a UGFREAK rep to chime in? @ugfreak

TLDR?
Is there a difference in carrier oils between the different Para Pharma testosterone formulations? I ask because I don't have an inflammatory response with the E 250 formulation but I do have a reaction with the SUSTA 350 and E 400 formulations.

View attachment 44742

Your body is a weird thing. It could react to something one time and not give a damn about it the next time. It's a good idea to definitely try out different gear to see what you like and what you don't like.

 

[ROIDDERS]

For the past 6 months I've only had experience with the different testosterone formulations put out by Para Pharma. To be clear, I'm not calling out Para Pharma or UGFREAK on this, I'm just trying to pin down the cause of inflammation. Before I pin any new vial of steroids I'll always do a subcutaneous micro dose (0.1 mL) as a "test" dose to ensure sterility and make sure I don't have some sort of reaction whether it's simply inflammatory or, at worst, an allergic/anaphylactic reaction. It seems far more bearable to deal with a subcutaneous reaction than it is with an intramuscular reaction.

Here's the situation: I've never had an inflammatory problem with the Para Phara TESTO E 250 formulation but I have with both the SUSTA 350 and TESTO E 400 formulations. The SUSTA 350 formulation seems to have been a much milder reaction as compared to the TESTO E 400 formulation. I've asked artificial intelligence like Gemini what could be the cause of an inflammatory reaction (outside of an infection) from a subcutaneous testosterone injection and got back an answer that it's either the carrier oil or it's the injection site (i.e. fatty subcutaneous tissue versus an intramuscular injection). I wrote "outside of an infection" because I have micro-filtered the TESTO E 400 formulation using a 0.22um hydrophobic PTFE filter and I still get an inflammatory response when injecting subcutaneously.

I feel like I've narrowed it down to either the carrier oil or it's that high concentration testosterone injections just don't do well subcutaneously. I say the carrier oil because artificial intelligence told me that high concentration testosterone solutions often use seed oils. I know for a fact that I don't have a problem with MCT oil because several bottles I've used in the past have said they contain MCT oil. The Para Pharma bottles I have don't say what type of carrier oil they contain so I'm left wondering. I asked Para Pharma directly months ago through a link on their website but they never responded. Maybe we can get a UGFREAK rep to chime in? @ugfreak

TLDR?
Is there a difference in carrier oils between the different Para Pharma testosterone formulations? I ask because I don't have an inflammatory response with the E 250 formulation but I do have a reaction with the SUSTA 350 and E 400 formulations.

View attachment 44742

A lot of times these brands will switch up their carrier oils so don't be afraid to switch things up and experiment with different options.

 

[2Thick]

For the past 6 months I've only had experience with the different testosterone formulations put out by Para Pharma. To be clear, I'm not calling out Para Pharma or UGFREAK on this, I'm just trying to pin down the cause of inflammation. Before I pin any new vial of steroids I'll always do a subcutaneous micro dose (0.1 mL) as a "test" dose to ensure sterility and make sure I don't have some sort of reaction whether it's simply inflammatory or, at worst, an allergic/anaphylactic reaction. It seems far more bearable to deal with a subcutaneous reaction than it is with an intramuscular reaction.

Here's the situation: I've never had an inflammatory problem with the Para Phara TESTO E 250 formulation but I have with both the SUSTA 350 and TESTO E 400 formulations. The SUSTA 350 formulation seems to have been a much milder reaction as compared to the TESTO E 400 formulation. I've asked artificial intelligence like Gemini what could be the cause of an inflammatory reaction (outside of an infection) from a subcutaneous testosterone injection and got back an answer that it's either the carrier oil or it's the injection site (i.e. fatty subcutaneous tissue versus an intramuscular injection). I wrote "outside of an infection" because I have micro-filtered the TESTO E 400 formulation using a 0.22um hydrophobic PTFE filter and I still get an inflammatory response when injecting subcutaneously.

I feel like I've narrowed it down to either the carrier oil or it's that high concentration testosterone injections just don't do well subcutaneously. I say the carrier oil because artificial intelligence told me that high concentration testosterone solutions often use seed oils. I know for a fact that I don't have a problem with MCT oil because several bottles I've used in the past have said they contain MCT oil. The Para Pharma bottles I have don't say what type of carrier oil they contain so I'm left wondering. I asked Para Pharma directly months ago through a link on their website but they never responded. Maybe we can get a UGFREAK rep to chime in? @ugfreak

TLDR?
Is there a difference in carrier oils between the different Para Pharma testosterone formulations? I ask because I don't have an inflammatory response with the E 250 formulation but I do have a reaction with the SUSTA 350 and E 400 formulations.

View attachment 44742

At the end of the day, as said above, everybody is going to be different. You may be okay with a small amount, even if you're sensitive to it, but a large amount could cause problems.

 

[CEO]

For the past 6 months I've only had experience with the different testosterone formulations put out by Para Pharma. To be clear, I'm not calling out Para Pharma or UGFREAK on this, I'm just trying to pin down the cause of inflammation. Before I pin any new vial of steroids I'll always do a subcutaneous micro dose (0.1 mL) as a "test" dose to ensure sterility and make sure I don't have some sort of reaction whether it's simply inflammatory or, at worst, an allergic/anaphylactic reaction. It seems far more bearable to deal with a subcutaneous reaction than it is with an intramuscular reaction.

Here's the situation: I've never had an inflammatory problem with the Para Phara TESTO E 250 formulation but I have with both the SUSTA 350 and TESTO E 400 formulations. The SUSTA 350 formulation seems to have been a much milder reaction as compared to the TESTO E 400 formulation. I've asked artificial intelligence like Gemini what could be the cause of an inflammatory reaction (outside of an infection) from a subcutaneous testosterone injection and got back an answer that it's either the carrier oil or it's the injection site (i.e. fatty subcutaneous tissue versus an intramuscular injection). I wrote "outside of an infection" because I have micro-filtered the TESTO E 400 formulation using a 0.22um hydrophobic PTFE filter and I still get an inflammatory response when injecting subcutaneously.

I feel like I've narrowed it down to either the carrier oil or it's that high concentration testosterone injections just don't do well subcutaneously. I say the carrier oil because artificial intelligence told me that high concentration testosterone solutions often use seed oils. I know for a fact that I don't have a problem with MCT oil because several bottles I've used in the past have said they contain MCT oil. The Para Pharma bottles I have don't say what type of carrier oil they contain so I'm left wondering. I asked Para Pharma directly months ago through a link on their website but they never responded. Maybe we can get a UGFREAK rep to chime in? @ugfreak

TLDR?
Is there a difference in carrier oils between the different Para Pharma testosterone formulations? I ask because I don't have an inflammatory response with the E 250 formulation but I do have a reaction with the SUSTA 350 and E 400 formulations.

View attachment 44742

bros i can remember first time i jammed T400 into my shoulder. was sore for days lol. felt like i got hit by pipe

 

[dementus]

I think inflammation is normal with high mg/ml brother
I remember T400 from Mexico was brutal

Thank you everyone for your feedback and experience. I think it has to a lot to do with microscopic crystals at concentrations greater than the carrier oil can hold (i.e. supersaturation). The best comparison I can give is to gout. If you've ever had gout you'll know that uric acid crystals get into your joints and cause all kinds of inflammation. I can imagine pushing an oil into your tissue that has sharp microscopic crystals in it could be quite inflammatory.

AI is an amazing thing. I asked Gemini the following question: