Go Back   Anabolex Forums > Chit Chat > Chat - Off-Topic
Home Forums Image Gallery Pharmacies
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-06-2008, 12:15 AM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
nibbe828's Avatar


nibbe828's Stats
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,746
Status: Offline
nibbe828's Info
Location: Not in Louisiana
Country:
Default Mpg old vs new

I've got an old car that I drive to work. It's a 95 with a v6 in it. This sucker gets 30mpg +-0.2 depending on how I drive. I've been monitoring this for a long time so the numbers are pretty correct.

I keep seeing advertisements on new cars at dealerships where they brag about their cars getting 31mpg.
Now, am I wrong in wondering why my almost 14 y/o car gets pretty much the same mpg as a brand new one? In the last 14 years nothing new has come out?

Granted, the otto engine is an old invention and it really hasn't changed very much, but why is that? With all the smart people out there why have they not figured out how to make an engine run more efficiently?

I smell a conspiracy somewhere!
__________________
A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.
-Thomas Jefferson
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 12:32 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Philthy's Avatar


Philthy's Stats
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,729
Status: Offline
Philthy's Info
Location:
Country:
Default

That is the american companies advertising the 30mpg shit. The Japanese people have been pioneering in engine efficiency for some years now. Honda has a direct injection engine that seems very promising.This engine coupled with hybrid technology would get insane mpg.

The ONLY problem with lean combustion is the production of Nitrogen Oxides.
You could filter them out with the cat but the exhaust temps are kind of cold when they reach the cat so it's not hot enough to work. THAT is the only thing stopping car industries from all being lean burn.

Honda Worldwide | i-VTEC I Video
__________________
-----------------------------------------------------

Weaselnutzninja: What if I tried to make a white history month?

Enanthanator: we have them, they are the other 11 months of the year!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 12:34 AM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Alchemy's Avatar


Alchemy's Stats
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,240
Status: Offline
Alchemy's Info
Location: Chernobyl
Country:
Default

Awesome another conspiracy theory lol!!!!

On a serious note though , its a good question

Alc
__________________
Алхимия - фиктивный характер, который был создан социопатом. Вся информация, которая объявлена на правлении, - в целях развлечения только

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 01:07 AM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Al_Joad's Avatar


Al_Joad's Stats
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 210
Status: Offline
Al_Joad's Info
Location: Phoenix
Country:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nibbe828 View Post
I've got an old car that I drive to work. It's a 95 with a v6 in it. This sucker gets 30mpg +-0.2 depending on how I drive. I've been monitoring this for a long time so the numbers are pretty correct.

I keep seeing advertisements on new cars at dealerships where they brag about their cars getting 31mpg.
Now, am I wrong in wondering why my almost 14 y/o car gets pretty much the same mpg as a brand new one? In the last 14 years nothing new has come out?

Granted, the otto engine is an old invention and it really hasn't changed very much, but why is that? With all the smart people out there why have they not figured out how to make an engine run more efficiently?

I smell a conspiracy somewhere!

What make and model is it? I'm having a hard time remembering a 90's V6 that got 30 MPG +- 0.2 no matter how you drive, espesially an automatic.

In the 90's I had a 1993 Accord SE automatic with a 4-cyl that got 22 MPG in the city and 26 MPG on the highway, no matter how I drove it. Hell, my 400lb 1000cc motorcycle only gets 40 MPG, and that's only when I'm a good boy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 09:53 AM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member


badapple's Stats
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 259
Status: Offline
badapple's Info
Location:
Country:
Default

In 07 the EPA changed the testing for MPGs, something to do with 65mph highway rather than 55 IIRC. What you see on the sticker is a median average, so depending on your driving style will dictate a plus or minus to that number.

Some of the most fuel efficient subcompacts get about 34mpg, so you can see close to 38 at times with them. They are doing this while producing less emmisions, so the one thing you need to go and check is that before making a comparison of the cars of ten years ago to today.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:32 PM.



SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5